I mean, we're not saying it doesn't work that way. It's kind of like how we had many people buy shirts on and tell us what better gamers they were. Is it possible to feel such a small change? If people are saying this is better, I wonder if it's a placebo effect.
But the jump from 125 Hertz to 1,000 Hertz is a seven-millisecond difference, whereas going from 1,000 to 8,000 Hertz, even though we're going eight times faster again, it's just a. This is what I would expect from a high-performance gaming mouse, and it does feel more responsive, everything from snapping around to targets to even just, you know, clicking folders and opening them and closing them. So let's flip to, what, say 1,000? - A thousand, yeah. But you can also mean the difference between 125 and something higher. And with a maximum delay of just eight milliseconds between when you physically move the mouse and when the computer gets that information, you can tell when a mouse is polling at 125 Hertz versus 1 Hertz. And that makes sense, 125 Hertz is kind of like the standard, so if you have an office mouse at work or something like that, the chances are that's its polling rate. Oh my god, this is going to take me a second. It is changing the polling rate to something like 125 Hertz. It does still work, like, it's still accurate. What's somewhat funny about it, though, is that it's not that it's unusable.
The mouse is updating its position about once per second, and it isn't very nice. In the AtomPalm software, you can change the polling rate to, well, anything you'd like. What? Okay, to appreciate why 8,000 Hertz kicks butt, let's start a bit lower. So the most lightweight properly-featured mouse is the Hydrogen, bringing us nicely to the party piece of the AtomPalm Hydrogen: the 8,000 Hertz polling rate. That goes to the Zaunkoenig MK1, but the MK1 lacks a scroll wheel or even side buttons. Now, at 45 grams, the Hydrogen is not the lightest mouse. A light mouse has two benefits.įor light mice, ergonomics matter less since picking it up is so easy, and they also have less mass, which means less inertia, so quick moves and adjustments should be more accessible. Once you have a sensor that isn't doing anything weird, make sure you have the lightest possible mouse. So you can cross-check with that before you purchase a new gaming mouse. It has a list of sensors and mice that are considered flawless. Fortunately, finding a sensor without those kinds of game-breaking flaws these days is pretty straightforward. For instance, the PMW3310 has a problem where, if you lift the mouse and then set it down, it can stop tracking correctly for a brief time, undoing all that work you put into lining up your sick flick shot. What can introduce errors, though, are sensor flaws. So basically, there's no chance of you physically outrunning a properly tuned modern gaming mouse. Nagasaki from 1989 called "Asymmetric velocity and acceleration profiles of human arm movements." In those tests, the maximum arm acceleration was 11.4 Gs, and referencing other less-reputable-sounding studies, we haven't found anything above 20. Is that a lot? Well, I was curious how that relates to what's humanly possible. Still, every real gaming mouse these days can track anywhere from 30 to 50 Gs of acceleration. On office mice or cheap generic gaming mice, this can be an issue. This occurs when you move the mouse faster than the sensor can detect, and generally, this results in the mouse failing horribly, kind of like someone running on a treadmill that's going too fast. Why does anybody use it? The next problem is sensor spin-out. While we're talking about easy ways to up your game, disable Motion Blur. Then, most games also have an option for raw mouse input, so you should enable that too. So, what can you do to have the best possible chances? First of all, disable your mouse acceleration. But in practice, many things can lead to imperfect mouse tracking, and ultimately, you miss that sick headshot by a couple of pixels. So is this the new competitive edge for gamers, or have we passed the point of human capabilities long ago?Īll right, in a perfect world, the movements that you make in real life with the mouse would be 100% accurately represented in the computer. Everything about it has been tuned to offer the lowest possible response time between you moving the mouse IRL and the cursor moving in-game. Yo, what's going on guys? Today let's talk about somethings about the gaming mouse and what is the best gaming mouse? Here we go now, although the hardware is pretty standard for a high-end gaming mouse, it has a Pixart PMW3360 sensor and OMRON switches.
0 kommentar(er)
